Writing Across Engineering: A First Year Implementation
Plans for Export
For years 6-10, we will seek export and transfer opportunities for
this course structure The first description of our writing approach was
given as a paper "Team Teaching: A Combined Rhetoric and Laboratory in
Freshman Engineering" at the 1996 ASEE meeting in Washington, DC.
With the separation of the writing and laboratory portions into
individual courses in English and in Engineering, respectively, the
designation Writing Across Engineering is adopted here for the
English portion. This cleavage provides maximum independence for our
instructors and those at other campuses to continue the spirit of
individual experimentation within a rubric of accepted writing structures
so that the no-added cost nature of the implementation can be maintained
in English departments. A first invited workshop for this development will
be held at Virginia Polytechnic Institute on March 14, 1996. It will be
given along with a workshop on the first year Product and Process
Engineering Laboratory concept.
Methods
The Writing Across Engineering composition course is an
educational product developed with SUCCEED funding and implemented
with the assistance of both the NCSU English Department and College of
Engineering. It is the nature of experiments in education that they must be conceived and , if successful, reduced to materials suitable for export, sold to new constituencies, implemented at a variety of institutions, and evaluated (assessed) for performance after each new installation. We expect to follow this historical pattern by working with the assistance of
the SUCCEED Focus Team on Student Transitions, and the local Curriculum
Implementation Teams (CITs) of the SUCCEED campuses. We will also
consider development of a common assessment form so that first year
Writing Across Engineering experiments can be utilized to discern
which students are most and least successfully served by this approach.
Materials
We are preparing a draft collection of readings in engineering and
technology which will be ready this summer. Trial versions will be
ready for export at summer’s end, and we will be pleased to discuss these
and other potential materials, including videos and art works, with
interested parties from other campuses, and to learn of related ongoing
experiments at any undergradaute level. Interested parties may contact
any of the authors at the following numbers: Ann Brown (919-515-3545),
Steve Luyendyk (919-515-4122), or David Ollis (919-515-2329), or reach
us by email at srlyend@unity.ncsu.edu or ollis@che.ncsu.edu .
Implementation
We seek collaborative opportunities with other campuses to help
implement local versions of this Writing Across Engineering
experiment. Specifically, we will be pleased to visit other SUCCEED
campuses, campuses of associated colleges and universities, and any
other interested campus to provide a short workshop and hear of related
local experiences. Further, we are interested in preparation of joint
proposals to receive SUCCEED funding for implementing this composition
structure at other SUCCEED and other campuses.
Assessment
An old truism in science is that "An experiment conducted without
subsequent analysis and interpretation is meaningless". A fortunate
feature of our Writing Across Engineering experiment is that every
campus has already installed a multitude of first year English sections
which have been offered under many traditions of materials utilized, from
a common set of readings to an "Every instructor for him/herself"
approach to choice of reading materials. In all events, the ability to
assess student outcomes for courses aimed at deepening skill and
efficiency in writing compositions is perhaps the best developed
evaluation portion of the undergradaute experience. Accordingly, we
anticipate that creating assessment protocols acceptable to the SUCCEED
assesssment team and to each local campus choosing to implement this
experiment should be an achievable, if not easy, challenge.
Conclusion
"Write about what you know, write about what you like, write about
what you want to be." Why shouldn’t engineering students, and many
others on this increasingly technical earth, read and write about the
technologies and technologists who are, for better or worse, in the
spotlight as we head into the 21st century ? And why not do this on day
one, rather than year four, of the undergradaute experience ? Engineering
education should follow the lead of all composition teachers: "Tell’em
where you are going, right at the start ! "
Return to the
Home Page