The first course, English 111, requires use of exposition and argument to develop each student’s writing proficiency. The first three assignments follow:
(ii) TOPIC: "Research the day you were born and analyze the growth of a
particular technology since that time. Perhaps a new product was
introduced on the market, or the military tested a new weapon. At what
point was the US in its space program? What kind of research and
development was occurring in medicine, industry, and at the university?
Your task will be to focus on a particular technology and to discuss
its development and its impact"
PURPOSE: To show you that technological development continues
beyond a discrete moment in time to influence society today"
REQUIREMENTS: This paper requires that you research the popular
media at the time of your birth. It does not have to be extensive research;
I am not looking for how many sources you find. Since the technology may
have affected or is affecting your life, you are free to use the personal
"I" when discussing impact; however, do not overuse it and be sure to
make the tone academic"
ANALYSIS will be the major feature of this paper. You need to
convince your reader that (1) your chosen technology has followed some
particular line of continued development since your birth, and that (2) it
has impacted current society.
(iii) RESEARCH PAPER (RP)
What is a RP? A RP is a paper that makes an argument based on well
researched evidence. To construct a good RP, four major skills are
required:
(1) The ability to find source material and to select data most useful to your argument.
(2) The ability to synthesize outside sources so that they support your thesis.
(3) The ability to subordinate outside "voices" to your own, (so that the takeover of a paper by an "authoritative" reference voice is avoided).
(4) The ability to analyze the information you choose to give to your audience. (Analysis encourages your reader to "see’ information the way you do, as well as explaining its significance.)
TOPIC: "Choose a topic related to your field of study.
EVALUATION: My first and formost concern is how well you logically construct and analyze your topic. A clear and well defined thesis will be a critical aspect of your work. I will pay particular attention to how you integrate supporting material through your work.
Adherence to the conventions of Standard Written English is expected.
(iv) FINAL EXAM (take home; must be typed)
After reading "Technology and the Tragic View" by Samuel Florman,
complete the following rhetorical tasks: Develop an introduction that
leads to a clear thesis statement about the article’s central argument. Do
not look for a sentence to pull out of the article; instead, determine what
you think is the article’s main pont and write it in a clear thesis
statement. Choose three examples from the text, and analyze how each
supports the central argument. Define the tone of the article. Does it
assist or detract from the article’s central point ? In ending this work,
write a paragraph that explains whether or not you agree with the
argument of the text, and why.
Assignments to date:
(i) TOPIC : Target a design problem, explain why it is a problem,
and give a possible solution the problem.
PROCESS: Follow the model below
EVALUATION: Precision of introduction and how it frames the work and helps reader understand your solution(25 pts) Level of detail in solution section (35 pts). Organization (15 pts). Style(10 pts) . Grammar (15 pts)
(ii) TOPIC Respond to the Axemaker reading. Burke and Ornstein claim in
their introduction that with each new technological advance we
(humanity) "...used to change the world. And when we changed the world,
we changed our minds, for each gift redefined the way we thought, the
values by which we lived, and the truths for which we died." Respond to
this statement by choosing any example of technology and discuss how it
changed the world and how it changed us, especially the way that we
think. This is essentially filling in the "missing text" of this work.
METHOD A two part paper. "...give thought to process of how the
world is physically changed by your example and to how our minds are
changed by both the example and its effect.
AUDIENCE: consider Burke and Ornstein to be your audience.
EVALUATION: An introduction that frames the discussion, and a
thesis that clearly states your argument. An organizational structure that unifies both requirements of the assignment. Tone appropriate to your audience. A well proofread paper.
These examples of implementing Writing Across Engineering in the firt year at NCSU indicate steady progress in permanently establishing this approach as part of a first year introduction to engineering. Over the next five years, we will continue to grow the experiment, and hope to reach 30-50% of each incoming first year engineering class by the year 2000.
Assessment: Beyond conventional course evaluations, we will design ,distribute, collect, and analyze a questionnaire which explores the introduction to engineering rceived by these students vs. those taking other or no introduction to engineering.

Previous Page
Next Section
Home Page